ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:27:31 +0100
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <AE647B4D-B038-483A-B1C0-D32CD02411EF@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

All,

As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we 
suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris 
Disspain.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC
> À : Chris Disspain <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
> 
> Chris,
> 
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our 
> joint meeting tomorrow.
> 
> We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
> 
> - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you 
> anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
> 
> - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how 
> can we maximise that value?
> 
> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect 
> to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to 
> run gTLDs?
> 
> - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) 
> will accelerate?



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>