<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:27:31 +0100
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <AE647B4D-B038-483A-B1C0-D32CD02411EF@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All,
As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we
suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris
Disspain.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC
> À : Chris Disspain <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
>
> Chris,
>
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our
> joint meeting tomorrow.
>
> We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
>
> Stéphane
>
>
> - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
>
> - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you
> anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
>
> - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how
> can we maximise that value?
>
> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect
> to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to
> run gTLDs?
>
> - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV)
> will accelerate?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|