<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- To: "'Stéphane Van Gelder'" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
- From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:38:29 +0300
- In-reply-to: <08FE266C-167E-4488-B133-57F1A7FD65A5@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <AE647B4D-B038-483A-B1C0-D32CD02411EF@indom.com> <08FE266C-167E-4488-B133-57F1A7FD65A5@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcvhNyFmwrcd6KixQlWMnCFvsY4JlQAddX3Q
Yet another topic that might be interesting for discussion: should we
exchange ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions?
Retirement of the tlds?
--andrei
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:28 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council
meeting tomorrow
All,
As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we
suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to
Chris Disspain.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC
À : Chris Disspain <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
Chris,
The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our
joint meeting tomorrow.
We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
Stéphane
- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
- What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do
you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how
can we maximise that value?
- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect
to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan
to run gTLDs?
- Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV)
will accelerate?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|