Re: AW: AW: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have communicated the Council's concern to David Olive, with whom I have been 
liaising on this.

I do not have any more information on this meeting at this point.

It is my view that the meeting should either not be formal, in which case a 
2-day meeting does not seem necessary and it may suffice to organise a dinner 
or some other social get-together event, or it should be formal in which case 
there is a set agenda and everything is recorded and transcribed as per any 
ICANN meeting.

Stéphane

Le 23 janv. 2011 à 09:57, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :

> Why can't Rod comment directly describing his intention? He has access to the 
> list.
> 
> I think you need a bullet point added if, indeed, it does go ahead (which I 
> am against).
> 
> - if the meeting takes place the meetings must be recorded and transcribed 
> and made available within 48 hours to ensure the content can be discussed at 
> the ICANN Meeting.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:38 AM
> To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF
> 
> 
> Thanks for those excellent suggestions Wolf.
> 
> What do others think about this approach, which I would support as it sends a 
> more gentle signal than simply "we're not going to attend"?
> 
>> - communicate to ICANN that the council has some reservations regarding this 
>> meeting
>> - if the meeting takes place you should attend
>> - provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session
> 
> Stéphane