<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Sponsorship of the ICANN Meetings
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Sponsorship of the ICANN Meetings
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:39:31 +0100
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB4B341B6BB4@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB4B341B6BB4@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I see no reason why this could not be discussed here.
Is there anyone from Staff that can address Adrian's questions?
As far as the Council taking a position on this, what do others think? Is there
a desire to work on drafting a letter on this topic?
Stéphane
Le 23 janv. 2011 à 09:49, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
> Stephane,
>
> I am not sure of the correct forum to bring this up however I do so here…
>
> I have been contacted by a number of my constituents regarding the severe
> raising of pricing of the sponsorship packages for the upcoming San Francisco
> meeting.
>
> In most cases prices within the different levels of sponsorship packages have
> doubled and it seem that ICANN is trying to secure a few sponsors at
> $500,000. This seems, to me at least, just plain crazy!
>
> My organization has sponsored on a number of occasions and are potentially
> again this time. However I am concerned of these changes and the impact they
> may have.
>
> The reason I bring it up in this forum is because I wonder if this is
> something the Council could take a position of. We all benefit from a healthy
> participation of sponsors. Without them the meetings would not exist.
> However, I believe ICANN is being just plain greedy and this could
> potentially harm future meetings.
>
> Your thoughts would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|