RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tim.  Looks good to me and seems consistent with the discussion we have 
had on the list. 

Glen - Would you please make sure that the motion is updated with this and the 
other amendment(s) that have been accepted as friendly.  Please show the 
deleted language in strikehout format with the new text highlight in whatever 
ways are possibe to make it clear exactly what the changes are.  Because the 
amendments have all been accepted as friendly, there is no need to show the 
amendments separately.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:38 AM
> To: Stéphane_Van_Gelder
> Cc: Mary Wong; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> 
> 
> Hopefully the final form of this friendly amendment request.
> 
> Replace the section titled "Changes to this Charter" with:
> 
> The Chair will submit requests for substantive changes to 
> this Charter to the GNSO Council for approval. The Chair may, 
> at any time, refer questions or requests for clarification on 
> any of the objectives or definitions contained in this 
> charter to the GNSO Council. Such requests may be relayed 
> through the Council Liaison.
> 
> 
> Tim  
>  
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 1:29 am
> To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Tim,
> 
> So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> 
> > 
> > That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is 
> fine with me.
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> > From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
> > To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Hi everyone
> > 
> > For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further 
> amendments 
> > to the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something 
> > wrong. I just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the 
> request. As I 
> > read it as forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping 
> > the reference to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the 
> > possibility that a WG member who is NOT the Chair could go 
> directly to 
> > seek Council approval, bypassing the Chair whose role it is 
> to achieve 
> > consensus amongst the WG.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Mary
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Mary W S Wong
> > Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs Franklin Pierce Law 
> > Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA
> > Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
> > (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> > 
> >
> 
> 
>