Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Mary.

Stéphane

Le 9 mars 2010 à 10:47, Mary Wong a écrit :

> Yes, I do - thanks.
>  
> Mary
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> 
> >>>
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:   "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:   "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 3/9/2010 3:46 AM
> Subject:      Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> 
> Thanks Tim. I accept this as friendly. Mary, do you accept it? If so, Glen, 
> please update the motion to reflect this.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 9 mars 2010 à 09:37, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> 
> > Hopefully the final form of this friendly amendment request.
> > 
> > Replace the section titled "Changes to this Charter" with:
> > 
> > The Chair will submit requests for substantive changes to this Charter
> > to the GNSO Council for approval. The Chair may, at any time, refer
> > questions or requests for clarification on any of the objectives or
> > definitions contained in this charter to the GNSO Council. Such requests
> > may be relayed through the Council Liaison.
> > 
> > 
> > Tim  
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> > From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 1:29 am
> > To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > Tim,
> > 
> > So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Stéphane
> > 
> > Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> > 
> >> 
> >> That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.
> >> 
> >> Tim 
> >> 
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> >> From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
> >> To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> Hi everyone
> >> 
> >> For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to
> >> the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I
> >> just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as
> >> forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference
> >> to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG
> >> member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval,
> >> bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the
> >> WG.
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> Mary 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Mary W S Wong
> >> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> >> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> >> Two White Street
> >> Concord, NH 03301
> >> USA
> >> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> >> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> >> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
> >> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
>