ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

  • To: "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:37:41 -0700
  • Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.2.08

Hopefully the final form of this friendly amendment request.

Replace the section titled "Changes to this Charter" with:

The Chair will submit requests for substantive changes to this Charter
to the GNSO Council for approval. The Chair may, at any time, refer
questions or requests for clarification on any of the objectives or
definitions contained in this charter to the GNSO Council. Such requests
may be relayed through the Council Liaison.


Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 1:29 am
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Tim,

So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

> 
> That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.
> 
> Tim 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
> To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi everyone
> 
> For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to
> the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I
> just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as
> forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference
> to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG
> member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval,
> bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the
> WG.
> 
> Cheers
> Mary 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>