Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Tim,

So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

> 
> That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.
> 
> Tim  
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
> To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi everyone
> 
> For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to
> the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I
> just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as
> forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference
> to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG
> member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval,
> bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the
> WG.
> 
> Cheers
> Mary 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
>