RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you both!

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 3:47 am
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane Van Gelder"
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, I do - thanks.
 
Mary
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>> 
From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>To:"Tim Ruiz"
<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>CC:"Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: 3/9/2010 3:46 AMSubject: Re: [council]
Friendly amendments to VI motion

Thanks Tim. I accept this as friendly. Mary, do you accept it? If so,
Glen, please update the motion to reflect this.

Stéphane

Le 9 mars 2010 à 09:37, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

> Hopefully the final form of this friendly amendment request.
> 
> Replace the section titled "Changes to this Charter" with:
> 
> The Chair will submit requests for substantive changes to this Charter
> to the GNSO Council for approval. The Chair may, at any time, refer
> questions or requests for clarification on any of the objectives or
> definitions contained in this charter to the GNSO Council. Such requests
> may be relayed through the Council Liaison.
> 
> 
> Tim  
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 1:29 am
> To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Tim,
> 
> So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.
>> 
>> Tim 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
>> From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
>> To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Hi everyone
>> 
>> For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to
>> the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I
>> just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as
>> forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference
>> to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG
>> member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval,
>> bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the
>> WG.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Mary 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mary W S Wong
>> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
>> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> 
>> 
>