Re: [council] Appointment of NCA to Houses

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

This means that, despite the overall support of the SGs for a solution which
was also inline with what the NCAs wanted themselves, we opt for the
solution that suits only one SG. Hardly seems fair.

I really think we should try and honour the NCAs' wishes if we can, and the
proposed option 1 did that.

There is majority support for this. Does it have to be unanimous support?

Stéphane


Le 15/10/09 09:32, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Since it does not appear that the 4 SGs managed to negotiate to a
> common acceptable position on the placement of the NCA appointees, and
> given that a week has passed since the meeting and the decision to
> give the council a week to try and find another acceptable solution to
> the lottery, I believe that we are now in the position of accepting
> the results of the lottery and allowing the 3 NCAs to start
> participating with their houses on the decisions concerning candidates
> for the chair position.
> 
> Thus, the NCA are allocated according to the following list as
> determined by the lottery:
> 
> Terry Davis - Contracted Parties House
> Olga Cavalli - Non Contracted Parties House
> Andrei Kolesnikov - Non Voting Seat
> 
> I will be writing up the process followed and notifying the Board and
> the Nomcom leadership of these results later today.
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> a.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature