<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:42:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: <3500A9DA-5B38-41E9-AFF5-0253D14C2381@acm.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <3500A9DA-5B38-41E9-AFF5-0253D14C2381@acm.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Aco6t3jvd/jP5mPkS928MIE0nQSEkQAO6rbQ
- Thread-topic: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
Thanks Avri. It is not clear to me what would be discussed with regard
to IDN ccTLDs. I assume the focus would be on the fast track but, with
the exception of a few remaining technical issues, most of the topics
have been beaten to death already with little impact from what the GNSO
said (e.g., contracts, fees, etc.). Would this be simply a rehashing of
old issues that would have no impact in terms of Board action in Seoul?
What would be the objectives of the session?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:28 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The conversation has continued and the following suggestions is on the
> table:
>
> > It is suggested that we run our ACSO session on Monday
> afternoon with
> > the general topic being 'the introduction of IDN ccTLDs'.
> The reason
> > for this is that current indications are that the Board may
> sign off
> > on this in Seoul and it is important that each AC and SO has an
> > opportunity to express any concerns they may have. The ACSO session
> > would be scheduled with the staff (Tina, Kurt and team) IDN session
> > acting as an introduction.
>
> The ACSO planning meeting is scheduled for after our meeting
> this week. I will add this to the status for that meeting,
> but am looking for feedback both on the list before the
> meeting or in the meeting itself.
>
> thanks
> a.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|