ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:42:10 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <3500A9DA-5B38-41E9-AFF5-0253D14C2381@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3500A9DA-5B38-41E9-AFF5-0253D14C2381@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Aco6t3jvd/jP5mPkS928MIE0nQSEkQAO6rbQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting

Thanks Avri.  It is not clear to me what would be discussed with regard
to IDN ccTLDs.  I assume the focus would be on the fast track but, with
the exception of a few remaining technical issues, most of the topics
have been beaten to death already with little impact from what the GNSO
said (e.g., contracts, fees, etc.).  Would this be simply a rehashing of
old issues that would have no impact in terms of Board action in Seoul?
What would be the objectives of the session?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:28 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
> Hi,
> The conversation has continued and the following suggestions is on the
> table:
> > It is suggested that we run our ACSO session on Monday 
> afternoon with 
> > the general topic being 'the introduction of IDN ccTLDs'. 
> The reason 
> > for this is that current indications are that the Board may 
> sign off 
> > on this in Seoul and it is important that each AC and SO has an 
> > opportunity to express any concerns they may have. The ACSO session 
> > would be scheduled with the staff (Tina, Kurt and team) IDN session 
> > acting as an introduction.
> The ACSO planning meeting is scheduled for after our meeting 
> this week.  I will add this to the status for that meeting, 
> but am looking for feedback both on the list before the 
> meeting or in the meeting itself.
> thanks
> a.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>