ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting
  • From: Stephvg2 <stephvg2@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:05:37 +0200
  • Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=jmLtpK5qHY8cZIA0P/0pnBhcyoHVa/72n1v29nZ/fLU=; b=AVdAE7jWGt685Pl60kuOw/eWN2sbHBT+hOKrel/7DQNYZT8DXNFGk/2XDsRR1IHPkH nW9bh5N9rKgY5L2GGrCFTh6kW2JVQCnZaTc99Ka6qsnjTyzJvW2L9PqrjOi4pCKHpGo1 /m54z0lS61kT268rXMob+Jn5EIWfzc+Ug9sEU=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=YUVDvLV1j11zgm9NBOBWUtnmFvjUMdbHXgY7k1+P2Vc8u8jSFaW5+RH+fBrq3H3j52 DKFZkK9EoCf99BCenRAhvfvnzqJcsKv/jdzaHZaXYotk83uwxP9i/CxdEl6cdQ+aLY4c 59KPMoV9BEad1xdbYt+saLicjDcGDZg8r/rOI=
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3F883@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3500A9DA-5B38-41E9-AFF5-0253D14C2381@acm.org> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3F883@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I share Chuck's concerns. Seems like in attempting to find the least potentially controversial topic possible, the final result is a discussion around a topic that's already history.

I'm sorry, but I am starting to think more and more that it may be time to dare ask ourselves if these ACSO sessions should be continued. Sometimes within this community that is Icann, we find it hard to say "this is actually not such a good idea" when we embark on a new initiative such as this...

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 21 sept. 2009 à 21:42, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Thanks Avri. It is not clear to me what would be discussed with regard to IDN ccTLDs. I assume the focus would be on the fast track but, with
the exception of a few remaining technical issues, most of the topics
have been beaten to death already with little impact from what the GNSO said (e.g., contracts, fees, etc.). Would this be simply a rehashing of old issues that would have no impact in terms of Board action in Seoul?
What would be the objectives of the session?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:28 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] another suggestion for ACSO meeting


The conversation has continued and the following suggestions is on the

It is suggested that we run our ACSO session on Monday
afternoon with
the general topic being 'the introduction of IDN ccTLDs'.
The reason
for this is that current indications are that the Board may
sign off
on this in Seoul and it is important that each AC and SO has an
opportunity to express any concerns they may have. The ACSO session
would be scheduled with the staff (Tina, Kurt and team) IDN session
acting as an introduction.

The ACSO planning meeting is scheduled for after our meeting
this week.  I will add this to the status for that meeting,
but am looking for feedback both on the list before the
meeting or in the meeting itself.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>