ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council Seats

I think it is up to us to finalize the details.  Hopefully our discussion
today will get us moving on that.
The proposed plan on the table now calls for the election of vice chairs
before the election of chair.  If the vice chairs are ineligible for the
chair position, then that eliminates two presumably viable candidates for
chair; that could make it harder to elect a chair.  So it has been suggested
that the vice chairs should be eligible for the chair position and if one of
them is elected as chair, then a new vice chair would need to be elected by
the affected House.


From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:21 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council

Thanks for the document Chuck.

I seem to remember a while back you asking whether the vice-chairs, once
elected, would be eligible to run for chair.

Has this been answered?

It would seem not to make much sense to me, as all 3 positions are crucial
to the Council?s day-to-day operational capacity, to have 2 of the 3
positions held by the same person...



Le 03/09/09 17:01, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Thanks to Avri for pointing out some date errors in the document I sent
yesterday.  A corrected, redlined version is attached.




From: Gomes, Chuck 
Sent: Wednesday,  September 02, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject:  Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council Seats

I would like to  submit the attached draft plan for discussion in our
Council meeting tomorrow  under "Item 9: Schedule/Actions  leading up and
for Seoul".


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>