ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council Seats

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council Seats
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:41:38 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3EFA3@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acor7bI2DUhVys2uTFmxtxO9C/7CmQAuLq3QAADs+WkAACHDQAAAl5wV
  • Thread-topic: [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council Seats
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

A very sensible approach.

Stéphane


Le 03/09/09 17:28, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Stephane,
>  
> I think it is up to us to finalize the details.  Hopefully our discussion
> today will get us moving on that.
>  
> The proposed plan on the table now calls for the election of vice chairs
> before the election of chair.  If the vice chairs are ineligible for the chair
> position, then that eliminates two presumably viable candidates for chair;
> that could make it harder to elect a chair.  So it has been suggested that the
> vice chairs should be eligible for the chair position and if one of them is
> elected as chair, then a new vice chair would need to be elected by the
> affected House.
>  
> Chuck
> 
>>  
>>  
>> 
>>  From: Stéphane Van Gelder  [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03,  2009 11:21 AM
>> To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
>> Subject: Re:  [council] RE: Council Transition Plan for Bicameral Council
>> Seats
>> 
>>  
>> Thanks for the document Chuck.
>> 
>> I seem to  remember a while back you asking whether the vice-chairs, once
>> elected, would  be eligible to run for chair.
>> 
>> Has this been answered?
>> 
>> It would  seem not to make much sense to me, as all 3 positions are crucial
>> to the  Council¹s day-to-day operational capacity, to have 2 of the 3
>> positions held  by the same person...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> Le 03/09/09  17:01, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a  écrit :
>> 
>>  
>>> Thanks to Avri for pointing out some date errors in the document  I sent
>>> yesterday.  A corrected, redlined version is  attached.
>>> 
>>> Chuck
>>> 
>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  From: Gomes,  Chuck
>>>> Sent: Wednesday,  September 02, 2009 12:52  PM
>>>> To: Council GNSO
>>>> Subject:  Council Transition  Plan for Bicameral Council Seats
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> I would like to  submit the attached draft plan for  discussion in our
>>>> Council meeting tomorrow  under  "Item 9: Schedule/Actions  leading up and
>>>> for Seoul".
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Chuck
>>> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>