RE: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
I amended my Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery alternative motion as suggested by Avri and as highlighted in the attached file and I posted it on the wiki. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:57 PM > To: Council GNSO > Subject: Re: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on > Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery > > > Hi Chuck, > > If the council is ready to vote on your motion, then i think > it would be appropriate to amend it to include the date for > voting on the PDP, i.e. the pro-forma motion one I am > offering can be folded into yours as a friendly amendment if > you accept it. > > On the other hand if the council is not ready to vote on > yours or if it fails in a vote, then my pro-forma motion can > stand as it is. I.e. > my motion can be contingent on yours. > > Would that be ok? > > a. > > On 12 Dec 2008, at 17:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote: > > > Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would > suggest what I > > hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 > January 2009 to > > 29 January 2009. That would give Staff until 15 January to provide > > the clarification that my motion seeks. > > > > I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded > > and passes. > > > > Chuck > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > >> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM > >> To: Council GNSO > >> Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on > >> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It was mentioned that in keeping with our current > practice of being > >> explicit with timings as much as possible, we should be more > >> specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after > >> receiving an Issues report. This motion is intended to fill that > >> gap. > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> a. > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> Moved by: Avri Doria > >> Seconded: > >> > >> Whereas: > >> > >> An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been > >> produced and introduced to the GNSO Council. > >> > >> Resolve: > >> > >> The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in > >> preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the > >> Council meeting on 8 January 2009. > >> > > > > Attachment:
Motion - GNSO Council Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Issues Report - 12 Dec 08 v2.doc
|