RE: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I
hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to
29 January 2009.  That would give Staff until 15 January to provide the
clarification that my motion seeks.  

I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded and
passes.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on 
> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It was mentioned that in keeping with our  current practice 
> of being explicit with timings as much as possible,  we 
> should be more specific about when we will take the required 
> PDP votes after receiving an Issues report.  This motion is 
> intended to fill that gap.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> ----
> 
> Moved by: Avri Doria
> Seconded:
> 
> Whereas:
> 
> An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has 
> been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
> 
> Resolve:
> 
> The GNSO Council members will consult with their 
> constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other 
> possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
>