Re: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

If the council is ready to vote on your motion,  then i think it would  
be appropriate to amend it to include the date for voting on the PDP,  
i.e. the pro-forma motion one I am offering can be folded into yours  
as a friendly amendment if you accept it.
On the other hand if the council is not ready to vote on yours or if  
it fails in a vote, then my pro-forma motion can stand as it is.  I.e.  
my motion can be contingent on yours.
Would that be ok?

a.

On 12 Dec 2008, at 17:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I
> hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to
> 29 January 2009.  That would give Staff until 15 January to provide  
> the
> clarification that my motion seeks.
>
> I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded  
> and
> passes.
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on
> > Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It was mentioned that in keeping with our  current practice
> > of being explicit with timings as much as possible,  we
> > should be more specific about when we will take the required
> > PDP votes after receiving an Issues report.  This motion is
> > intended to fill that gap.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > a.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > Moved by: Avri Doria
> > Seconded:
> >
> > Whereas:
> >
> > An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has
> > been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
> >
> > Resolve:
> >
> > The GNSO Council members will consult with their
> > constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other
> > possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.