RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,

I disagree.

In my opinion, ICANN has recourse at the Registrars level. If the reseller is 
out of line, the Registrar that appointed them should be held accountable.

I am not keen on creating further contracted parties at this level.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 3:19 AM
To: Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses 
approach

At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:


Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house 
 (that is not a splinter group) ?

One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible 
conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.

Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a 
Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and with 
a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and make 
them a contracted party.

Alan