<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Chuck, thanks for your first thoughts on this.
My concern about "GNSO flexibility" as you put it is that the flexibility at
present is
100% in the users house!
There is zero flexibility in the contract parties house.
In other words its contract parties (a fixed two constituency group) and the
rest of the
world in the users house.
This fits poorly to the "birds of a feather" concept and the idea of new
constituencies.
The relationships between users and the three types i mentioned are a direct
parallel to the
contract parties.
Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house
(that is
not a splinter group) ?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|