<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:25:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20081208161929.WHRW1669.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip6.srvr.bell.ca>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclZcyE0lGSLp/XeakyEViaoldzPxA==
- Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Just a question: if resellers have a contract with ICANN, don¹t they then
become ICANN-accredited registrars?
Thanks.
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
+33 1 48 01 86 17
INDOM Noms de domaine / Domain names
124-126, rue de Provence
75008 Paris. France
0820 77 7000
(Prix d'un appel local)
De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
http://www.indom.com/
Daily domain name industry news: http://www.domaines.info/
Mon blog/My blog : http://www.domaines.info/
Le 08/12/08 17:19, « Alan Greenberg » <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
>
>> Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties
>> house (that is not a splinter group) ?
>
> One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible
> conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.
>
> Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a
> Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and
> with a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and
> make them a contracted party.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|