ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:29:31 +1100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <C5634151.4849%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20081208161929.WHRW1669.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip6.srvr.bell.ca> <C5634151.4849%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AclZcyE0lGSLp/XeakyEViaoldzPxAAAGaHA
  • Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Exactly my point Stéphane!

Adrian


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:26 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Council GNSO'
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses 
approach

Just a question: if resellers have a contract with ICANN, don't they then 
become ICANN-accredited registrars?

Thanks.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
+33 1 48 01 86 17

INDOM - Noms de domaine / Domain names
124-126, rue de Provence
75008 Paris. France
0820 77 7000
(Prix d'un appel local)
De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
http://www.indom.com/

Daily domain name industry news: http://www.domaines.info/
Mon blog/My blog : http://www.domaines.info/



Le 08/12/08 17:19, « Alan Greenberg » <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house 
 (that is not a splinter group) ?

One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible 
conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.

Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a 
Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and with 
a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and make 
them a contracted party.

Alan
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>