<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:30:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB063715AF6C@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclZcyE0lGSLp/XeakyEViaoldzPxAAAGaHAAAAWWrE=
- Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Yes, sorry Adrian. I got your email just after sending mine and saw you were
making the same point.
Stéphane
Le 08/12/08 21:29, « Adrian Kinderis » <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Exactly my point Stéphane!
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:26 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg; Council GNSO'
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two
> houses approach
>
> Just a question: if resellers have a contract with ICANN, don¹t they then
> become ICANN-accredited registrars?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> +33 1 48 01 86 17
>
> INDOM Noms de domaine / Domain names
> 124-126, rue de Provence
> 75008 Paris. France
> 0820 77 7000
> (Prix d'un appel local)
> De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
> http://www.indom.com/
>
> Daily domain name industry news: http://www.domaines.info/
> Mon blog/My blog : http://www.domaines.info/
>
>
>
> Le 08/12/08 17:19, « Alan Greenberg » <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties
> house (that is not a splinter group) ?
>
> One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible
> conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.
>
> Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a
> Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and
> with a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and
> make them a contracted party.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|