RE: [council] draft of 1 slide report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Please see below.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:06 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] draft of 1 slide report
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the reply.
> 
> I am not sure I now what you mean about "comment period ended 
> yesterday"  While we had an informal comment period, we did 
> not have a formal ICANN comment period.  And I thought that 
> yesterday we decided to ask for a formal comment period.

CG: I thought you meant the ICANN Public Comment Period on the WG report
and I stated the wrong date anyway.  It ended on 25 April.  Might want
to be more specific either on the slide and/or in your comments about
the slide, saying "formal comment period re. proposed implementation
plan".

> 
> While it is true that we could decide in the absence of a 
> Board decision, my understanding from our meeting the other 
> day was that several constituencies, at this point were 
> uncomfortable with making any decisions on process until they 
> knew the final substance of the Board's decision.
> 
> - how about: Tabled until next meeting.  Waiting for end of 
> formal comment period and board decision.

CG: That's fine with suggested change above.

> 
> In relation to the IDNC comment, the council has not yet 
> considered whether or in what way we will consider this, so I 
> am not sure how I can say we will.  Also I am not confident 
> that the council is anywhere close to consensus on this issue yet.
> 
> On IRTP,
> 
> - how about: other definitions moved to a future PDP effort 
> dealing with related policy issues.

CG: Good.

> 
> thanks for the comments
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 26 Jun 2008, at 08:35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Avri,
> >
> > Note that the comment period ended yesteday for GNSO 
> Improvements so 
> > you might want to change the second bullet to say "tabled 
> until after 
> > board decision", although I don't recall us being that 
> specific.  What 
> > if the Board decision takes several months?  It seems to me that we 
> > might be able to take a vote on the plan at one of our next two 
> > meetings regardless of whether the Board decision was made; 
> the vote 
> > could be again delayed but we would at least consider like we did 
> > yesterday.
> >
> > Under IDNC, do we want to note that the issue of 
> county/territory IDN 
> > names will be considered further in response to GAC concerns.  I 
> > personally think this would be good to communicate but am 
> comfortable 
> > with your decision.
> >
> > For IRTP, I suggest you change "other definitions pulled from PDP 
> > until related issues can be resolved"  to "other 
> definitions moved to 
> > a yet to be initiated PDP".
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:13 PM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: [council] draft of 1 slide report
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> SO reports are down to one required slide.
> >>
> >> here is my draft.
> >>
> >> comments welcome, though there isn't much time.
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >
> 
>