<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:58:44 +0100
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have been having some background discussions with Chris Desspain,
the chair of the ccNSO council, and others regarding the GNSO
council's message and request to the Board. At, at least, the first
reading, there has been some level of concern on his part and the part
of others in the ccNSO community with our message to the Board
relating to IDN TLDs. It has been interpreted by some as indicating
that the GNSO is against the fast track and against IDNs. While I
tried to explain that this is neither what was written nor what was
intended, it does seem to be interpreted that way by some. The ccNSO
is meeting today to discuss a reaction to the GNSO council's message.
I expect to have more information on that tomorrow.
Regardless of what happens with their reaction two possibilities have
come out of the discussion:
- the possibility of a face to face meeting between the two councils
in New Delhi to discuss some of the different perspectives on the IDN
TLD issue
- the exchange of liaisons between the two councils, so that in the
future there would be a better understanding of each others
intentions, processes and decisions.
I would like to find out if there is support for these two items among
others on the council.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|