<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
- From: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:13:58 +1100
- In-reply-to: <CCBFEBFD-FB82-4A03-BBF7-1DCFF015E6B7@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CCBFEBFD-FB82-4A03-BBF7-1DCFF015E6B7@psg.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AchXVT9stiESXBlIRO6hWcDb0cpz2QAAZY8Q
- Thread-topic: [council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
Avri,
Thanks for this follow up.
I think both points are valid and desirable.
I would certainly support them.
Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com
The information contained in this communication is intended for the
named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain
legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error,
please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 7:59 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Some initial reactions from the ccNSO on the GNSO's
message to Board regarding IDN TLDs
Hi,
I have been having some background discussions with Chris Desspain,
the chair of the ccNSO council, and others regarding the GNSO
council's message and request to the Board. At, at least, the first
reading, there has been some level of concern on his part and the part
of others in the ccNSO community with our message to the Board
relating to IDN TLDs. It has been interpreted by some as indicating
that the GNSO is against the fast track and against IDNs. While I
tried to explain that this is neither what was written nor what was
intended, it does seem to be interpreted that way by some. The ccNSO
is meeting today to discuss a reaction to the GNSO council's message.
I expect to have more information on that tomorrow.
Regardless of what happens with their reaction two possibilities have
come out of the discussion:
- the possibility of a face to face meeting between the two councils
in New Delhi to discuss some of the different perspectives on the IDN
TLD issue
- the exchange of liaisons between the two councils, so that in the
future there would be a better understanding of each others
intentions, processes and decisions.
I would like to find out if there is support for these two items among
others on the council.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|