RE: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Philip.  What I wanted to avoid in the wording was 'advocating
task forces', at least as they are defined in the current PDP.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
        Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:45 AM
        To: 'Council GNSO'
        Subject: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform
        
        
        If I read Council right (thanks Chuck, Avri, Adrian), 
        I will amend to "qualified support" where I previously wrote
"partial support".
         
        I think we are all on the same page here. 
        (Chuck we are not advocating task forces here just laying down a
marker for flexibility which I note you support).
         
        Philip