ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform

  • To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform
  • From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:01:54 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <007701c830d1$bb9966f0$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20071126140343.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.6e55214c71.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <007701c830d1$bb9966f0$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcgweLiFj0atLQUTS9aMDPTu96uozwAWJPTgAACeHZA=
Hi Philip,
 
as I just wrote in my last mail. I do not think that we are in unanimous
agreement of the recommendation therefore we should strike it from the list.
 
tom

  _____  

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Philip Sheppard
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 09:45
An: 'Council GNSO'
Betreff: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform


If I read Council right (thanks Chuck, Avri, Adrian), 
I will amend to "qualified support" where I previously wrote "partial
support".
 
I think we are all on the same page here. 
(Chuck we are not advocating task forces here just laying down a marker for
flexibility which I note you support).
 
Philip
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>