<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: An issue or not an issue - that is the question
Hi,
In principle I agree with this approach.
I would have preferred waiting to ask the staff to do this until the
new GTLD process was completed. As it stands, once we ask for the
report, we are on a timetable. And though we don't do a very good
job of following the time table in any case and are hoping for a
rationalization of the timing in the PDP in the future, i think it
better to not start something we cannot follow through on.
a.
On 25 maj 2007, at 11.01, Philip Sheppard wrote:
Avri,
all new activities have resource implications.
Council should timetable its priorities based on the list of
identified issues that we wish
to do something about.
There is no shame in identifying an issue today and then agreeing
to start a PDP on it in 6
months time based on an assessment of priority and resource.
Indeed, this may be sound management.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|