<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Rationale of thresholds for initiating issues reports and PDPs
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Rationale of thresholds for initiating issues reports and PDPs
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=oiV5WEI/cRrBm+5wu3KmMYbSAOl07ChdKG1iSPio8LAP/gLxTcDqh+k+Wk775LpqQooIAM6m+iFUxzpZe6bozYgmKQ0ATKLl8Jp1eVVTwKGX88BdLfYolN8IcFh3HFBbY/39t654OcHciRseNH4vYevm4UPCLXMiaX/hDQolpBI=;
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB54046D4C7F@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Bruce,
--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I believe this was to prevent the GNSO Council becoming a
> barrier for
> 2-3 constituencies deciding to investigate a matter.
>
[snip]
> I note that none of these issues appeared to come up in the
> GNSO review
> process - ie the thresholds for issues reports did not seem to
> come up
> as an area of concern. So I am assuming that the Board will
> not wish
> to change them.
It makes perfect sense.
I note that you carefully :) set aside in your next email my
first consclusion and question about the weighted vote: Is there
any type of vote where each registry and registrar rep does not
count for 2 votes, or is it so for all votes the council take?
thanks,
Mawaki
>
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|