It would probably worthwhile for the Taskforce to include the reserved
list mechanism of .eu in their data gathering efforts. As far as I
know
this has been a rather extensive exercise including all EU member
states. Thought .eu is not a gTLD the findings might very well be
usefull especially in terms of geographic/geopolitical and "moral"
issues.
Best,
tom
Am 11.01.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
two comments after a quick review -
a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion
and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is
any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b)
taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not
reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue
forward with.
b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote
per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required
to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full
defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by
simply having one vote per constituency.
-r
On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:
<DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w