ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Statement of work for working group on reserved names - DRAFT for Council


two comments after a quick review -

a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b) taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue forward with.

b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by simply having one vote per constituency.

-r

On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:

<DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>