Re: [council] Statement of work for working group on reserved names - DRAFT for Council

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It would probably worthwhile for the Taskforce to include the reserved
list mechanism of .eu in their data gathering efforts. As far as I know
this has been a rather extensive exercise including all EU member
states. Thought .eu is not a gTLD the findings might very well be
usefull especially in terms of geographic/geopolitical and "moral"
issues.

Best,

tom

Am 11.01.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
> two comments after a quick review -
> 
> a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion  
> and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is  
> any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b)  
> taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not  
> reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue  
> forward with.
> 
> b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote  
> per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required  
> to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full  
> defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by  
> simply having one vote per constituency.
> 
> -r
> 
> On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> 
> ><DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w