<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:34:07 -0800
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 02:32 PM 11/9/2007 Friday -0800, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>This puts a (process) conclusion ahead of any (policy) ballot. I suggest not making (process) comments, after all, in theory we could reach a two-thirds position among the voting RC members.
Dear Eric: Precisely why I am making a second motion. Our negotiator must have the consensus of the Consistory in order to be credible. I trust you'll endorse Tim's motion --- *and* mine:-)
Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|