<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] IDN evaluation by ICANN (Was: Sponsorship of IGF Workshops
- To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] IDN evaluation by ICANN (Was: Sponsorship of IGF Workshops
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=zEVTjbslUf23eXjOpD/3bGJfRgBsw9/M0udMW5xyq3IKuAlWZDBPyRv2la2MDYB909qCFIKK851DpgixSO0eonhGW6gRGOHMRmQiCsbuFugSQS+ah5JOVw7jnHnzInINFoBbeLBFSKvz4zh4qyZKhrwXHl2LM0ZU19ZfdwZnTK4=;
- In-reply-to: <20070706092512.GA14940@nic.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Since it is the list monitor whom you threw out this barb at, I feel appropriate in asking you why you did it. Take my word for it, neither Joe nor I take offense at it and it is clearly in the bounds of lively debate. I was just wondering why it was done.
Eric
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:49:48PM -0400,
Joe Baptista wrote
a message of 71 lines which said:
> I would go further and say that ICANN has actually cause problems in
> the technical function. I'm a bit concerned with their little
> experiment in list IDN TLDs as A RRs.
In the (unlikely) case that some people read Baptista's messages, I
want to emphasize that I do not find any ICANN text mentioning "listing
IDN TLDs as A RRs" (which would be a strange idea, indeed).
The current plan is here:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-19jun07.htm
---------------------------------
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|