ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] RE: [alac-admin] Re: [ga] More ALAC Follies


Sotiris and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,

Good direct question, but an obvious one.  And also a question that has
been ask on other "Attempts" by ICANN to create a "Atlarge" and has
never been adequately and/or directly answered.  Be aware Vittorio will
likely avoid answering such a question directly or accurately much along
the lines of Bret's comments that Danny kindly provided.

Most of us here "Know" Vittorio, and his history of participation and/or
interaction.  He purposefully avoids direct answers to direct questions and
uses obviscation with reckless abandon.  This to some may be the "language
of diplomacy" but if true such is not effective in arriving at workable
solutions.

sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Vittorio, you sidestepped the entire issue once more as is your wont... so
> with ALL DUE RESPECT please explain to us how certain ALAC structures were
> approved when they DO NOT HAVE A WEB SITE NOR ANY WEB BASED MECHANISM TO
> FACILITATE PUBLIC DISCUSSION/INPUT?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> > sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
> >> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>>we do not grant exclusives to our
> >>>applicants, we just verify whether they meet some basic criteria.
> >>
> >>
> >> What criteria?!  As Richard Henderson pointed, out most of your approved
> >> alac 'structures' don't even have a web site, and those few who do have
> >> NO
> >> web based mechanisms for user interaction/input/discussion!
> >>
> >> Give it up Vittorio!  The sham is now patently clear to everyone.  You
> >> and
> >> your alac DO NOT represent dns users in any way shape or form; you
> >> represent yourselves and you're simply another group of snouts feeding
> >> at
> >> the ICANN trough as Abel Wisman pointed out...  Shame on you (but you
> >> probably have no concept of shame anyway).
> >
> > Sorry, you and some other long-time GA participants seem to have a very
> > strange concept of dialogue. I am more than happy to discuss successes
> > and failures of the ALAC model both publicly and privately - in fact,
> > this is one of the major items on our Vancouver agenda - but only on the
> > basis of reciprocal respect.
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> > http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>