RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, 18 June 2011 3:48 PM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'GNSO Council List'
Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan

And that a cwg or jwg may not have been the appropriate mechanism for the issue.

Tim
________________________________
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:09:47 +0200
To: <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'GNSO Council List'<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan

Thanks Mary,

Would you be up for drafting a proposed statement, for the Council's 
consideration?

Stéphane



Le 18 juin 2011 à 09:01, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>> 
a écrit :


In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible deliverables and courses 
of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made during today's discussion, viz., 
that the GNSO Council consider circulating a brief statement to the ICANN 
community, stating its support for the work being done by the JAS WG and 
reiterating the importance of the issues they are considering.




Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:

"Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx<mailto:andrei@xxxxxxxx>>

To:

"'Adrian Kinderis'" 
<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, "'GNSO Council 
List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>

Date:

6/18/2011 1:13 AM

Subject:

RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan

I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial.  Or there 
will be always a workaround for "endless discussion".

--andrei

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan

As I discussed in the Working Session today.

The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them);

-          Stephane speaking directly to the Board
-          Katim's email and the issues of the JAS WG
o   Processes within the Council
-          The future of Cross Community Working Groups
o   Publishing of reports etc
-          The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal 
processes and representation
o   Multi stakeholder make up
o   Differing views/ differing

It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of 
action in order to promote resolution.

Adrian Kinderis