RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan

[<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible deliverables and
courses of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made during today's
discussion, viz., that the GNSO Council consider circulating a brief
statement to the ICANN community, stating its support for the work being
done by the JAS WG and reiterating the importance of the issues they are
considering.


 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
To:"'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council
List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6/18/2011 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan

I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial.  Or
there will be always a workaround for "endless discussion".  
 
--andrei
 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan

 
As I discussed in the Working Session today.
 
The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them);
 
-          Stephane speaking directly to the Board
-          Katim’s email and the issues of the JAS WG
o   Processes within the Council
-          The future of Cross Community Working Groups
o   Publishing of reports etc
-          The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its
internal processes and representation
o   Multi stakeholder make up
o   Differing views/ differing 
 
It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses
of action in order to promote resolution.
 
Adrian Kinderis