<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
- To: "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
- From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:11:57 +0800
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C201A@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C201A@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acwtc/258pnAYBmpSZWb+e9uh/L1rQAAfBJw
I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial. Or
there will be always a workaround for "endless discussion".
--andrei
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan
As I discussed in the Working Session today.
The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them);
- Stephane speaking directly to the Board
- Katim's email and the issues of the JAS WG
o Processes within the Council
- The future of Cross Community Working Groups
o Publishing of reports etc
- The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal
processes and representation
o Multi stakeholder make up
o Differing views/ differing
It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of
action in order to promote resolution.
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|