ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR


Stephane is in a meeting at the moment and probably will not be able to respond 
until the meeting.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:18 AM
        To: Stéphane Van Gelder
        Cc: Gomes, Chuck; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
        
        
        what about Rafik's amendment, submitted on behalf of NCSG: 



                
                I would like to submit this following edit regarding this part :
                
                
                "Obviously, any such communications would need to respect 
reasonable
                restrictions like the review teams' adherence to the Chatham 
House rule, and the SO/ACs should be expected to exercise prudence and to only 
make use of the opportunity when it is necessary to support the teams and/or 
convey major concerns."  
                
                
                with that one
                
                
                
                "It is expected that any communications or other input sought 
and received will be provided in good faith, and that SOs/ACs will exercise 
prudence and make use of the opportunity when it is necessary to support the 
teams and/or convey major concerns. In exceptional circumstances, a SO or AC, 
the review teams or members thereof may consider it necessary to subject such 
communications or other input to reasonable restrictions such as the Chatham 
House rule, and where this is the case, the relevant parties to the affected 
communication or input shall, as far as possible, be informed in advance."


        On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:


                Yes
                
                Le 27 janv. 2010 à 21:58, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
                
                


                        I would accept this as a friendly amendment.  Stephan, 
as the seconder of the motion, would you also accept it as friendly?
                        


                        Glen - please add this amendment to the motion.
                        


                        Chuck 
                        


                                -----Original Message-----
                                

                                From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
                                

                                Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:36 PM
                                

                                To: Gomes, Chuck; 
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
                                

                                council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                

                                Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
                                

                                Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on 
the ARR
                                


                                On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to 
suggest the 
                                

                                following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST).
                                

                                The draft amendment attached is targeted to 
provide more 
                                

                                flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let 
themselves 
                                

                                organize their support teams rather than to 
constitute 
                                

                                support teams in advance. 
                                


                                Looking forward to a fruitful discussion 
Wolf-Ulrich
                                



                                -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
                                

                                Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
                                

                                Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35
                                

                                An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; 
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
                                

                                council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                

                                Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
                                

                                Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on 
the ARR
                                


                                Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested 
edit, it would 
                                

                                be very helpful.
                                


                                Chuck 
                                


                                        -----Original Message-----
                                        

                                        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                        

                                        [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of 
                                        

                                KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
                                

                                        Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 
PM
                                        

                                        To: william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                        

                                        Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
                                        

                                        Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council 
letter on the ARR
                                        



                                        Following a consultation within the 
ISPCP constituency I'd like to 
                                        

                                        address the creation of "Support Teams" 
(ST). There must be a clear 
                                        

                                        distinction between the RTs and 
potential STs in order to avoid STs 
                                        

                                        emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the 
composition of the ST pools has 
                                        

                                        carefully to be taken into 
consideration or should even be 
                                        

                                regulated.  
                                

                                        If applicable this should be expressed 
in the council response.
                                        


                                        Apart from that the ISPCP constituency 
endorses the draft response.
                                        


                                        Wolf-Ulrich
                                        




                                        -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
                                        

                                        Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                        

                                        [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Im Auftrag von William Drake
                                        

                                        Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 
16:40
                                        

                                        An: GNSO Council List
                                        

                                        Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter 
on the ARR
                                        


                                        Hello,
                                        


                                        Attached please find the drafting 
team's proposed response to the 
                                        

                                        draft proposal on the Affirmation 
Reviews Requirements and 
                                        

                                        Implementation Processes, for 
discussion with our 
                                        

                                respective SGs and 
                                

                                        in the Council.
                                        


                                        Best,
                                        


                                        Bill
                                        








        ***********************************************************
        William J. Drake
        Senior Associate
        Centre for International Governance
        Graduate Institute of International and
         Development Studies
        Geneva, Switzerland
        william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
        ***********************************************************
        
        




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>