RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested edit, it would be very helpful.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> 
> Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd 
> like to address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There 
> must be a clear distinction between the RTs and potential STs 
> in order to avoid STs emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the 
> composition of the ST pools has carefully to be taken into 
> consideration or should even be regulated.  If applicable 
> this should be expressed in the council response.
> 
> Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
> An: GNSO Council List
> Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to 
> the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements 
> and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our 
> respective SGs and in the Council.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
>