RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would accept this as a friendly amendment.  Stephan, as the seconder of the 
motion, would you also accept it as friendly?

Glen - please add this amendment to the motion.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:36 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to suggest the 
> following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST).
> The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more 
> flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let themselves 
> organize their support teams rather than to constitute 
> support teams in advance. 
> 
> Looking forward to a fruitful discussion Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35
> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested edit, it would 
> be very helpful.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
> > To: william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> > 
> > 
> > Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd like to 
> > address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There must be a clear 
> > distinction between the RTs and potential STs in order to avoid STs 
> > emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the composition of the ST pools has 
> > carefully to be taken into consideration or should even be 
> regulated.  
> > If applicable this should be expressed in the council response.
> > 
> > Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
> > 
> > Wolf-Ulrich
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von William Drake
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
> > An: GNSO Council List
> > Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to the 
> > draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and 
> > Implementation Processes, for discussion with our 
> respective SGs and 
> > in the Council.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> > 
> > 
>