RE: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO Reform

["Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross,

I don't think there actually needs to be a super rush to get to the vote.  I would assume the motion would go through a discussion period, and then a voting period.  I would hope that both would be over a week long actually.  But our typical procedure takes almost a month, and I think the deadline is before that.

I am not proposing a 24 hour vote or anything like that.  What I would think should happen is we end the vote the day before the response is due, and we allow as long a time as possible for voting and debate.  But I think that still requires a faster track than our norm.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:14 AM
To: 'Ross Rader'; Rob Hall
Cc: 'Clarke D. Walton'; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rc-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO Reform

I have to agree with Ross.

I haven't had time to read the full document yet so voting on it at this
point would be hard for me...


Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager

INDOM - Noms de domaine / Domain names
124-126, rue de Provence
75008 Paris. France
0820 77 7000
(Prix d'un appel local) 
De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
www.indom.com

Daily domain name industry news: www.domaines.info
Mon blog/My blog : www.stephanevangelder.com




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: vendredi 11 avril 2008 15:52
To: Rob Hall
Cc: Clarke D. Walton; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
rc-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO
Reform


It would be nice to take a few minutes to read and comment on this  
document before we rush it through a vote. Why the rush?

On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Rob Hall wrote:
> Thanks Clarke,
>
> I think this is some great work.
>
> I make the following motion:
>
> Whereas ICANN has posted a plan for GNSO Reform and;
> Whereas ICANN has requested comments on this plan;
> Be it hereby resolved that the Registrar Constituency of the GNSO of  
> ICANN adopts this Position paper as it's official position in  
> regards to ICANN's proposed GNSO Reform Plan.
>
> As I believe the deadline for submissions is sooner than our regular  
> voting process allows for, I also request that the "fast track"  
> motion and voting process be used for this motion, to ensure we have  
> our submission in by the ICANN imposed deadline.
>
> I believe the motion now needs 5 members to second it.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> ] On Behalf Of Clarke D. Walton
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:09 PM
> To: 'registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; rc-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO  
> Reform
>
> RC Members:
>
>
> Attached please find for your consideration the RC's proposed  
> Position Paper re GNSO Reform.
>
>
> Clarke Walton
> Registrar Constituency Advocate