Re: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO Reform

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It would be nice to take a few minutes to read and comment on this  
document before we rush it through a vote. Why the rush?
On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Rob Hall wrote:
> Thanks Clarke,
>
> I think this is some great work.
>
> I make the following motion:
>
> Whereas ICANN has posted a plan for GNSO Reform and;
> Whereas ICANN has requested comments on this plan;
> Be it hereby resolved that the Registrar Constituency of the GNSO of  
> ICANN adopts this Position paper as it’s official position in  
> regards to ICANN’s proposed GNSO Reform Plan.
> As I believe the deadline for submissions is sooner than our regular  
> voting process allows for, I also request that the “fast track”  
> motion and voting process be used for this motion, to ensure we have  
> our submission in by the ICANN imposed deadline.
> I believe the motion now needs 5 members to second it.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> ] On Behalf Of Clarke D. Walton
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:09 PM
> To: 'registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; rc-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] For RC Consideration: Position Paper re GNSO  
> Reform
> RC Members:
>
>
> Attached please find for your consideration the RC's proposed  
> Position Paper re GNSO Reform.
>
> Clarke Walton
> Registrar Constituency Advocate