<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Updated Ballot on Tasting
This is correct. Thanks. Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Goldstone
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:03 PM
To: Ross Rader
Cc: Registrar Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Updated Ballot on Tasting
Ross,
I believe it's already been established that we're voting on view #1
or view #2, or both, or neither, and nothing else within the ballot
that has already been voted on.
ie.:
[Which view do you agree with?]
[] Agree with view 1
[] Agree with view 2
[] Agree with both views
[] Do not agree with either view
[] Abstain
It's also been acknowledged that the two views do not adequately cover
the RC positions but that we've run out of time and so the Excom
unanimously voted against correcting the ballot but instead going with
the already corrected ballot.
~Paul
:DomainIt
At 11:49 AM 1/31/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
>On 31-Jan-08, at 11:41 AM, Russ Goodwin wrote:
>
>>the answer is "both"
>
>Thanks Russ.
>
>Can someone associated with creating the ballot confirm this?
>
>Ross Rader
>Director, Retail Services
>t. 416.538.5492
>c. 416.828.8783
>http://www.domaindirect.com
>
>"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
>- Erik Nupponen
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|