<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Re: Ballot to determine whether ICANN Registrars favor or oppose Domain Tasting.
- To: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Re: Ballot to determine whether ICANN Registrars favor or oppose Domain Tasting.
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:42:54 -0500
- In-reply-to: <4790F56B.7080309@naugus.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: John Berryhill, Ph.d., Esq.
- References: <20080117095547.9924.qmail@qmt.tidewinds.com> <4790F56B.7080309@naugus.com>
- Reply-to: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AchaBG3i2cjdUCi0Q9uH4mo3pcZysAADueSg
> I prefer the term used by Chuck Gomes when he first told us
>of the practice.
Chuck Gomes also followed up on the Mar Del Plata discussion, and expressed
a strong preference that others not try to simplify his extended comments.
David Maher also opined on the issue of abuse, and PIR implemented a policy
that ended what they considered to be an abusive practice - promptly and
without complaint. Verisign can do the same thing if so motivated.
> AGP is just a euphemism for that Abuse.
To clarify - is "Against Domain Tasting" synonymous with "Against the AGP",
then?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|