[registrars] FW: [council] Re: ICANN GNSO - Group 3356 - PAX NAME: Klein ***Response is Required ASAP***Attn Annie

["Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

FYI, now that “Pandora’s box” has been opened (see the email below)...

 

FYI, the cost of ICANN’s travel agent’s flights in economy were only maginally cheaper than what my agent could get them for in business. Maybe this is accounts for ICANN’s high travel budget. 

 

Jon’s idea of budget allocation to be spent by the Constituency is seeming more and more like a good idea, we could do far better than this!

 

I’ll keep you posted of any response.

 

Regards,

 

Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director

AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com <http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/> 

 

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Norbert Klein
Sent: Saturday, 12 January 2008 6:10 PM
To: Sabregrpair; STACY.HOFFBERG@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Denise Michel; Paul Twomey; GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Re: ICANN GNSO - Group 3356 - PAX NAME: Klein ***Response is Required ASAP***Attn Annie

 

I address this response mail to "Sabregrpair" <sabregrpair@xxxxxxxx>

but I copy it also to several other persons, because it shows that the present discussion about a fair sharing of travel and hotel expenses for GNSO Council members needs obviously to be carried to a different level, first of all also to 

Ms. Stacy Hoffberg, in charge of ICANN travel arrangements.

Dear Stacy,

I just found the following mail this morning in my inbox, requiring a response within 72 hours:

= = =

Hello, 

fare is now USD 2577.70 no lower fares available 

Please review the tentative itinerary below for changes or approval to ticket. You have 72 hours from the time of receipt of this email to respond, otherwise your tentative flight reservation will automatically gets canceled... 

. . .

PENALTY FARE REMARKS 

THIS IS AN ADVANCED PURCHASE NONRFUNDABLE FARE. 

ANY CHANGES MAY RESULT IN A HIGHER FARE AND CHANGE FEE...

= = =

I am utterly surprised. When I started to inquire about flights to the New Delhi ICANN meetings and made a tentative reservation a long time ago, I could have bought the ticket for US$535. Then, in the meantime, it went up to US$590 – and I had mentioned this also in my earlier mails, always adding that the airfare prices I quote are subject to possible change.

So this morning, after receiving the mail above, I contacted immediately my normal agent again: the ticket is now $695, changeable and refundable – and still available, if I would purchase it early in the week. And it is exactly for the same airline and for the same flights for which the ICANN agent would charge 3.7 times more than my agent here.

I remember some comments in the discussions of the Council that ICANN should not too easily accept to pay for the expenses which the GNSO Council members incur for travel and face-to-face meetings. Especially, there was hesitation expressed about paying hotel costs for GNSO Council members. 

In the meantime we had the GNSO information about the prices for the suggested hotels – the hotel rates for one night are in the general range of the GNP per person for one year in Cambodia.

As I am working as a volunteer without salary since the last 18 months, I would appreciate: 

1) to be authorized to buy my ticket here for US$695.00 (for later re-imbursement), and

2) to receive the difference between the two prices quoted ($2,577.70 minus $695.00), that is $1,882.70, towards covering hotel costs in New Delhi.

Naturally, I need an answer within less than 72 hours, as that is the deadline that was given in the mail to me this morning. 

I am aware that this may raise some difficult questions, but I think the price difference is so outrageous that I cannot but put this up for wider discussion for a quick decision now, and towards future policy discussions.

Sincerely,

Norbert Klein

Member of the GNSO Council

cc: 

Ms. Denise Michel

Dr. Paul Twomey

GNSO Secretariat

GNSO Council