<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding - Friendly Amendment
- To: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ross Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding - Friendly Amendment
- From: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:21:05 +1100
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <895F0F387276204FA66324084B9B2D4A1CB135@MOMEX2.momentous.ca>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <895F0F387276204FA66324084B9B2D4A1CB135@MOMEX2.momentous.ca>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acg8FgQQjrl/I4ntTh6vTaT2xiMqBQAAjJOgAAB9pUA=
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding - Friendly Amendment
Thanks for the feedback Rob.
Very constructive.
Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com
The information contained in this communication is intended for the
named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain
legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error,
please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Hall [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2007 9:12 PM
To: Ross Rader; Adrian Kinderis
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding - Friendly Amendment
I will endorse Ross's motion to get the ball rolling on a formal
discussion period.
And I make one suggested clarification that I hope Ross will take as a
friendly amendment.
I believe the intent here is for ICANN to not fund the GNSO counselors.
I agree with that.
However, I am not against a constituency choosing to fund it's own
counselors out of their own constituency fees. If the Business
constituency wants to pay for its counselors to attend the GNSO
meetings, they should be allowed to. Same would go for us. If we
wanted to fund part or all of our counselors costs, we should be able
to.
I am afraid that the way Ross's motion is worded, it would appear that
we are against funding of any type from any source. So Ross, I ask if
you can tighten it up a bit to be more clear, as I don't believe you
were trying to stop other constituencies from covering their own
counselors costs.
Rob
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|