<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Registries must use Registrars
<html>
<body>
At 08:07 PM 3/4/2007 Sunday +0000, Rob Hall wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I believe this to be something
different than a reserved list. I think<br>
this may be that the Registry doesn't want to use Registrars for the<br>
first 5,000 names. This should not be allowed. </blockquote><br>
Dear Rob: dotMuseum was one of the first seven approved in
2000. I don't think it is new:<br><br>
<ul>
<li>The proposed agreement provides for the elimination of the wildcard.
<li>Appendix S allows for the Sponsor to register names directly with the
Registry Operator, strictly limited to 5,000 names.
</ul>I remember Cary speaking with John Kressin (sp) about the wild
cards. Problem was difficulties caused by TLD longer that 3
characters.<br><br>
Another reason to strongly oppose any registrations directly by registry
is one of audits. How could we trust any registry to stop at, say,
5,000? They should be audited. But we have seen how little hope
there is for ICANN to conduct an audit in the RegisterFly
case;-(<br><br>
Regards, BobC<br><br>
</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|