<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] .INFO recent notification
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] .INFO recent notification
- From: Sam BAVAFA <s.bavafa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:03:24 +0100
- In-reply-to: <45EB2011.5010508@gmo.jp>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdeqO3FLBKTqMqcEduBAgAX8gEx7A==
- Thread-topic: .INFO recent notification
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Hi to all
Is any of you received the notification from afilias regarding .INFO
challenged and cancelled domain names ?
Is someone aware about any law suit against the cancellation decision ?
How is is possible for a registry to leave some domains active for 5 years
and decide to delete them because of trademark missing ? If the registrant
was not in his rights to use that domain, why they could do that during all
that time ?
Thank you for your help and opinions
Sam
> De : Ward Benjamin <benjamin@xxxxxx>
> Date : Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:37:53 -1000
> À : "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc : Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : Re: [registrars] FW: [alerts] ICANN News Alert -- Proposed .MUSEUM
> sTLD Registry Agreement Posted for Public Comment
>
>
>
> I agree. However, I have seen this before with .jp domains and JPRS. If
> I remember that case involved the registry taking all country and Japan
> prefecture and city names.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>> At 09:09 AM 3/3/2007 Saturday -0500, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
>>> FYI ? please pay particular attention to Appendix S, which permits the
>>> .museum Sponsor to register up to 5,000 names directly with the
>>> Registry Operator.
>>
>> Dear Jon: One basic "rule* from time immemorial was that the registries
>> were not to be registrars. Regards, BobC
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|