Re: [registrars] WG: [Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input]

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tim,

Am 27.02.2007 schrieb Tim Ruiz:
> Tom,
> 
> No comments on the support/priority ranking. But I do have concerns with
> the intent of a matrix approach like this. Some of the recommendations
> are interdependent in my view. For example, 19, 20 and 21. And some of
> the recommendations under Working procedures seem dependent on 6 and 18
> under Structure. 
> 
> If that is not currently being considered, I would suggest putting that
> on the table for Lisbon.

I agree with our analyses.

I would suggest that the RC Excom is scheduling at least half a day at
our constituency meeting to discuss not only these recommendations but
in what general direction we as registrars think the GNSO should evolve.

Best,

tom

> 
> Tim 
>  
> 
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [registrars] WG: [Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency
> input]
> From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, February 27, 2007 8:23 am
> To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Dear fellow registrars,
> 
> could you please review the attached document to make sure that our
> views
> are
> correctly represented. If there is any need for change please let Bruce,
> Ross
> or me know.
> 
> Best,
> 
> tom 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Im
> Auftrag von Denise Michel
> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 11:32
> An: GNSO Council
> Betreff: [Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input]
> 
> Following-up on Bruce's request -- would you please send your
> constituency's
> edits to the attached chart to the GNSO Secretariat
> <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> by Friday, 2 March.  Please let Glen
> know
> if you need more time.
> 
> Again, this chart will be used to inform the Board Governance Committee
> and
> will help form a basis for selecting a few recommendations relating to
> major
> structural issues for public discussion in Lisbon.  We are scheduling a
> public forum on Monday in Lisbon to discuss GNSO Improvements.
> 
> Thanks.
> Denise
> 
> Denise Michel
> Vice President, Policy Development
> ICANN   www.icann.org
> denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the constituencies
> on
> the LSE report.
> 
> Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the
> recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation.
> 
> The rankings are high, medium, low.
> 
> This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the public
> forum.
> 
> The recommendations have also been broken into the following categories:
> 
> - participation
> 
> - rules
> 
> - structure
> 
> - tools-support
> 
> - working procedures
> 
> Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections.
> 
> The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board Governance
> Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations
> (such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon.   The aim
> is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather than
> debate
> whether the website could be better.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w